Thursday, November 09, 2006

'Nuff said...


LONDON - A 22-year-old man suffered internal injuries after lighting a small firecracker he had inserted into his buttocks, paramedics said Thursday.

The incident took place Sunday, when Britain celebrated Bonfire Night, traditionally marked with fireworks to celebrate the Guy Fawkes’ gunpowder plot to blow up Parliament in the 17th century.

The man suffered burns and other unspecified internal injuries in the incident in Sunderland, 275 miles north of London.

Katherine Shenton, a spokeswoman for the North East Ambulance Service, said a caller had phoned in that the victim was bleeding after the firecracker exploded.

Several of the man’s friends recorded the incident on a mobile phone. The blurry images show a man bent over with his pants down and a white flash as the firecracker explodes.

The Times newspaper reported the man is a soldier who recently returned from Iraq.

© 2006 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Wednesday, November 08, 2006

Not gloating...

Okay, the election is over. The Democrats have won the house, while the senate, as of this writing, hangs on the outcome in Virginia. As George W. described it, the cumulative effect of it was getting a "thumpin'". Immediately, Donald Rumsfeld is gone. That's good news.

The bad news is that all this was necessary.

Look, I'm a lifelong Republican. In college I was a campaign volunteer for Gerald Ford. I've only voted for two Democratic candidates in my life. (if you want to know: Ford, Reagan, Reagan, Bush, Clinton, Dole, Bush, Kerry.) I'm not happy about having to split with, and in the last two elections advocate against, my party.

As has been said before in other places, I did not leave my party, my party left me. In recent years it has been captured by ideologues, and they've taken it in directions I find dangerous and thoroughly destructive.

Maybe, just maybe, with this election things have bottomed out. I hope so.

Tuesday, November 07, 2006

NYC may ease rules for gender change


Hey... there's this from MSNBC:

NEW YORK - The city wants to make it easier for transgender New Yorkers to switch the sex listed on their birth certificate even without undergoing reassignment surgery, putting the city at the forefront of efforts to redefine gender.

Under present city rules, only people who can show proof of surgery qualify for getting a revised birth certificate. Even then, the only change made is the elimination of any reference to gender on the document.

The new plan, unveiled last month, would let birth records reflect the new gender. It would also allow changes for people who hadn’t had genital surgery, but could show substantial proof that they have undertaken other steps to irrevocably alter their gender-identity — like undergoing hormone therapy.

The policy change is one that advocates for New York’s sizable transgender community have requested for years, but which has taken on greater significance in a post-Sept. 11 world of increased security.

New Yorkers need to show picture ID to enter office towers, air terminals, public monuments and all sorts of government buildings. They need them to apply for a job too, or buy beer at a neighborhood deli.

The trouble comes when someone inspects those documents, and notices that a person’s listed gender doesn’t appear to match the way they look and dress.

“That can be a very dangerous situation for a transgender person,” said Cole Thaler, transgender rights attorney for the national legal aid group Lambda Legal.

'Outdated' system
Thaler said having a birth certificate with a gender that matches a person’s appearance will ease the way to getting other government records, including passports, drivers’ licenses and Social Security records.

Lorna Thorpe, Deputy Commissioner of New York’s Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, called the current system “outdated.”

“A lot of transgender persons use different techniques to switch genders,” she said. Some try hormones. A smaller number undergo surgery — in part because not everyone is medically capable of undergoing the procedure.

All but three states now allow people who have had a sex change to get a new birth certificate and New York City has done so since 1971. The city now issues about a dozen of the revised birth certificates a year.

Of the states that allow similar changes of birth certificates, almost all currently require proof of a gender-reassignment surgery.

Tennessee has a law expressly prohibiting a change of gender on a birth certificate. Ohio and Idaho also won’t allow the change because of court rulings or as a matter of administrative policy.

© 2006 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.

Go Vote!


I did!